DI has to follow the line set by LP. That having been said, in this case, it's not a matter of reacting to what has been posted on a MB, the request was to comment on what MHRA responded to an interested party's question. The 'we don't comment on our application to MHRA' made a lot of sense up to a year from the acceptance of the application, but the current circumstances are that this is taking a long time, and the stock is in the process of failing again. Hence, I think it's time for LP to step up to the situation and answer your query, simply state that the MAA has not been rejected. They might or might not know any more than that - I'm not saying they necessarily need to tell us everything they know. But some word from the chief ought to be forthcoming IMO. I have certainly stated that to DI. Complaining to the MB has zero effect on the company, as you can telll, with DI saying we all need to ignore social media. But a rational (like without screaming and/or slagging LP) msg to DI has at least a chance of having an impact imo, if DI hears from enough investors saying e.g., 'what you are doing wrt to not providing information is not working and the stock is failing again. You are harming your shareholders. It's time for you to try a different approach'. That might not achieve anything but it's all we can try to influence LP. Bitching on the MB is bitching for bitching's sake, and slagging a stock you own is really stupid, imho.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
