well the MHRA would not just hold up the decision until the guideline arrives, to then just say: super now that the guideline has been made available to the public we can finally, after over 18 months of review, decline the DCVAXL application right. There would not be a small percentage of logic in that. So if you agree that ECA issue is the holdup, and you thus no longer think that NWBO is appealing objections, which is huge coming from you, then the next logical step is to follow my reasoning.