Slave, thanks for your response. I've continued to follow your subsequent posts this morning and IMHO believe you've provided more information and clarification in a few hours than I normally see in months. Hope you become a regular contributor. That being seen, while I appreciate the process details you've provided and the gymnastics the MHRA has gone through to get to this point, I still have to ask why so long? Granted, DCVax-L didn't fit their existing model, but how long does it take to build one and issue the proposed SI? At the time the MAA was submitted, the MHRA was being criticized for not [processing submissions in a timely manner and reports a year later indicated there were still problems. And of course, there was the recent matter where a MP submitted questions that were just blown off. I would suggest some delay may be due to bureaucratic indifference. Still believe the process could have been completed and the SI issued at least 6 months earlier.
Look forward to seeing more posts from you in the future.