News Focus
News Focus
icon url

manibiotech

07/04/25 11:09 AM

#774170 RE: Doc logic #774168

Here is quick summary from AI
So I don’t know what do you want FDA , you want FDA to do something they don’t do , and that too for a small , practically unknown company on an OTC , before company agrees to submit a formal application :
,
“🔹 The FDA does not “approve” a Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) in the sense of issuing a formal approval letter like it does for a drug or device marketing application. Instead:

✅ FDA reviews and accepts the SAP as part of the overall trial protocol during the Investigational New Drug (IND) or Biologics License Application (BLA) process.
✅ The SAP becomes a binding part of the trial protocol that sponsors must follow once agreed with the FDA.
✅ If the SAP is modified after initial agreement, significant changes may require protocol amendments, which the FDA must again review and accept.

?

🚫 But the FDA does not grant an “SAP approval” certificate or decision. There’s no official “stamp of approval” issued specifically for the SAP alone.

?

🔎 What happens in practice:
• Sponsors typically submit their SAP as part of their trial protocol or as a separate document during the IND phase.
• The FDA may provide comments, request clarifications, or recommend changes.
• Once the sponsor addresses these, the FDA’s acceptance effectively indicates that the plan is adequate for evaluating trial data, but not formally “approved.”

?

📌 Key takeaway:

The FDA’s role is to accept an SAP as adequate for the trial’s intended endpoints, but it does not approve SAPs as standalone regulatory actions.”
icon url

ilovetech

07/04/25 11:58 AM

#774176 RE: Doc logic #774168

Doc Logic - The agency has a HUGE credibility problem, least of which goes unnoticed by 🙊🙈🙉 investors still assuming older paradigms are in play. The enormous pubic pressure to remove COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood vaccine schedule, albeit not entirely from the market, moved the three agency directors to remove recommending the vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women. This action helped shape my opinion about the new leadership's integrity. Despite the availability of unrelenting peer reviewed papers literally coming out on the daily, and massive data sets used, as confirmatory of no benefit, but mostly, asymptomatic and or symptomatic harm, demonstrates that these men are to a degree compromised. It doesn't necessarily mean they're corrupt, but rather, they may have decided to pick and choose their battles selectively, to maintain their positions long enough, to see public sentiment deride the power of special interests.

A recently leaked communication dump btw BP interests and congressional representatives point to a $2 million allocation to pay for an elaborate psychological campaign through various media platforms to get RFK Jr. ousted by September 2025.

IMHO, these directors are FULLY aware and meaning to leapfrog passed the degraceful approval record this two year investigation revealed:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-approved-hundreds-drugs-no-evidence-they-work/