News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jetmek_03052

06/22/25 8:50 PM

#363179 RE: johnydollar #363178

Once again, you misdirect.

They converted shares that Linda gave the OK for. Linda signed the contract that gave them the right to do so. But that isn't shorting shares. Not regular shorting, nor naked shorting. The POINT is that they have NEVER been fined for naked shorting the stock of ANY company!

Yes, they've been fined for PLENTY of OTHER things, and deservedly so. I don't believe anyone is saying they were "wrongfully" fined for acts they were found GUILTY of. Yet, they HAVE NOT been found guilty of "naked shorting" ANY company. Indeed, they have not even been ACCUSED of "naked shorting"!

It's VERY apparent that you have a serious lack of understanding of that fact.
icon url

Topfuel

06/23/25 6:06 AM

#363185 RE: johnydollar #363178

Interesting DBMM gets released by the courts and Sec. Kramer gets released last week from the Sec charges.
Allowing conversions is a death sentence especially when a company cannot function with normal business transactions.But that's why they have the reverse split.It's like the Hokie Pokie songConversion out Reverse splits in Shake shareholders all aroundAnd Then do it all again That's what it's all about
Sorry you got Hokie pokied