The paid pumpers always look for the needle in the haystack as a way to defend the lack of approval instead of just acknowledging that Linda asshat submitted a flawed document that has many issues. Now many of the 100% wrong guesses and opinions are saying July. I remember when they all agreed it would be July of 2023. You can't make this shit up any better. After July and no news, maybe 'Fall'?
You were the one questioning the rational for the cost of keeping the London College site operating and now there is this opportunity for point of service with Flaskworks being done there eventually. Seems pretty obvious that NWBO would start small and then expand. London College seems well suited for that with artisan and Flaskworks capability. Then there is the pilot program for MHRA and NICE working together to get reimbursement decisions timed up with approval. What are the requirements for disclosure of submissions to NICE under that program? I am not aware of them and it seems more like back and forth between MHRA and NICE with regard to info updates that leads to a timing decision for when to recommend submitting a formal request for reimbursement by NWBO or other which then has a very expedited review time because almost all pertinent info has been shared. In the mean time they plan on having 60% of all applications given a decision by 240 days from submission vs 40% which offers real hope for reimbursement in just 8 months if 240 days ever really means 240 days; ). Best wishes.