There is a reason that the article was written, but I'm not sure what it is.
This is what the article says
"This is in part because mobile applications that need more than 15 to 20 Mb/s are rare, while mainstream consumer applications requiring more than 1 Gb/s border on the nonexistent."
So I asked AI.
"Mobile applications that require more than 15-20 Mb/s are generally focused on high-bandwidth activities like streaming high-resolution video, gaming, and video conferencing. These apps include platforms like Netflix, YouTube, video conferencing apps (like Zoom), and some mobile gaming applications. "
Then I checked on atonimous vehicles requirements
"Autonomous vehicles require significantly higher bandwidth than conventional cars, exceeding 1 Gbps, to handle the massive amount of data generated by sensors like cameras, radar, and lidar. Automotive Ethernet, with speeds up to 10 Gbps, is a key technology for meeting these demands, along with the potential for even higher speeds."
Personally, I want my atonimous vehicle to have 6G speeds available everywhere.
Robotax should be in operation before in late 2026 proly level 5 everywhere in 2035 but it will need the 6G "everywhere"
X, I was listening to Jenson the other day he said that everything that we know will have a digital twin. In other words you will be in the real car and real time there will be a digital twin, so driving decisions on the radius of turns how hard to brake etc. will be made in the "virtual twin" first, before executing and Elon is shooting for a 1,000 times better performance than a human. (should I hit the baby, the telephone pole or the gasoline truck etc.)
There will be digital twins of factories, cities, everything changes will be made there first. To which, I ask, are we currently actually living in a digital twin?