News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dennisdave

04/28/25 5:30 PM

#764581 RE: exwannabe #764575

A rejection from the MHRA is a material event and should have been disclosed in the 10K.
The text in the 10K suggests that the continued working with teams of specialized consultants on the MAA process was about the production of documents related to the inspections not about appealing or objecting to the MHRA . So again if the text about actively engaged in the ongoing process is about making objections, then they lied in the 10K.

The Company continued working with teams of specialized consultants on the MAA process, including onsite inspections in the U.K. and U.S., and ongoing production of documents and information before, during and after the inspections. The Company is actively engaged in the ongoing process