That is gaslighting. Your "article" contains several factual inaccuracies such as incidence of GBM, expected reimbursement rate etc. Each of these on its own is not a big deal but when you do the math and add them up it paints a less optimistic potential of the platform. That's why this was a soft bash and very elegantly done indeed. The timing of the writing also adds to the suspiciousness.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
