News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jedi171

04/11/25 11:38 AM

#141362 RE: tdbowieknife #141361

That shows your depth of knowledge of Humbl. Jacob was never a member let alone a “founding member” of humbl.
icon url

NoMoDo

04/11/25 11:45 AM

#141366 RE: tdbowieknife #141361

Wait... Jacob was a founding member of HMBL? This is news. Could you post a link, or is this the type of "facts" that Surf keeps discussing... ones that have absolutely no factual basis.

It's about the MONEY Jackob Fernane suppled HMBL as a founding member

BTW, Jacob and PL were sued by HMBL for failing to supply MONEY as outlined in the contract. Even after they settled, the next two Q's stated that he still didn't live up to his obligation yet. Not that real facts actually should interfere with a good bash. As you said, you are all about maximizing, misdirection, redirection, and lying.
icon url

F14SVF24

04/11/25 11:52 AM

#141368 RE: tdbowieknife #141361

HUMBL will push many into the shadows when their conspiracies fail. Are you related to Michael Moore? Good luck with the conspiracy theories and going down rabbit holes, only to find out that Alice was sold a bunch of chit from the ones chasing her down the hole.
icon url

ListenToTheTrees

04/11/25 11:57 AM

#141369 RE: tdbowieknife #141361

Let’s set the record straight, because the accusations flying around are more heat than light.

First, accusing me of “minimizing, misdirection, and twisting the obvious” is nothing more than emotional deflection. If you have facts, present them. If you don’t, don’t try to shout down reason with rhetoric.

Second, your assertion that “it’s about the MONEY Jacob Fernane supplied HUMBL” misses several critical distinctions. Yes, Fernane was involved early on, but being an investor/financier does not make someone responsible for the current operations, leadership, or trajectory, or a founding member.

I’m not the one dramatizing anything. But if people are trying to create a scandal around Fernane’s unrelated legal issues, it says more about their desperation than it does about HUMBL. He isn’t an officer. He doesn’t hold an executive role. He doesn’t shape policy or manage operations. So trying to smear the company by association is lazy at best and dishonest at worst.

Finally, claiming my logic is “miss wired” without engaging with the actual points I’ve made just proves my point. If you want to debate, bring evidence. If you want to vent, just admit it.

Let’s not confuse noise with substance.