Replies to post #760132 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[NotSure2]

You just prove me right with your chatgpt answer, Ill copy/paste your answer, but more importantly, why are you feeding AI with claims that I have never posted???? You really are a manipulator, this is beyond belief.

Lets start with what prove me right, with your own answer:

"The MHRA will inform the company directly before NICE or anyone else." ✅ Correct

"NICE wouldn’t be told the decision before the company." ✅ Correct again — nobody here claimed otherwise.
(***DennisDave and Atl think otherwise, and your grok answer also thinks otherwise***)

"The 2 April NICE update confirms they’re relying on NWBO for updates." ✅ True

"This doesn’t imply approval is guaranteed or imminent." ✅ 100% accurate — and again, I’ve emphasized that while the NICE listing is a positive regulatory indicator, it is not confirmation of approval.

DennisDave, Atl and your grok answer are saying that MHRA will tell NICE if aproval chances decline (unfavorable). Well your grok answer kind of, but now I understand what happenned.

But the most important here->

What do you feed your AI with? I never said any of the following, so you are either lying to it, OR, it just show how AI can be wrong.

Things I never posted here, but is somehow claim by your AI answer: Basically everypoint in your second part (the first 3 summary point). As for #4 totally irrelevant.

"Cites historical examples like Tecentriq, which had a NICE listing years before approval, to argue there’s no predictive value"

I never said anything remotely close, no idea what Tecentric is. Your AI project must be on drugs.

This isn’t speculation — it’s alignment of facts. If Not2Sure believes another therapy is being reviewed, the burden of proof is on him to identify it. So far, he hasn’t

I never posted anything about another therapy being reviewed. See how AI is far from perfect? Creating things out of nowhere. Totally made up.

“No MHRA update = no progress”

??? WTF is this, I never said anything remotely close to this.

You are feeding AI with stuff I didnt say?

Too many to list. Basically almost the entire second part.

Is this the reason why you replied on my answer to DennisDave, and not my answer to your post? So people cant see what you posted?

As for your point #4, your AI project have some mistakes: Validation happened in January, not March.

Without context, AI interpret it as if I was saying NWBO wasnt validated I guess.


But what I was refering to is that Hoffman, and probably you as well (I need to double check) were claiming Validation will happen within 4-7 days. But based on Hoffman own graph/stats, I was saying the more likely chances of validation were 3rd week of Januray. Then you guys were telling us that we were wrong, blah blah blah, NWBO application will be validated within the week, blah blah blah. (not sure if you were part of the cabal again)

Anyway, this is totally irrelevant.

Thanks for proving my points above.

By the way, you might want to start every question from scratch with AI. Keeping the same window/project is bad, any mistake will be compounded/duplicated.