sleven, another explanation can be that Sarissa used their off shore fund to move the 8.6mill shares hence the explanation for the 24mill holdings, then back up to their original position of 33,470,000 when they transferred the shares back to reduce their cost.
Sleven, I tend to agree with you. I think he's a snake. And this is why people are getting more pissed at many companies leaders as they seem to milk the positions for what they can get and to hell with retail shareholders. Transparency and communication my a$$.