News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gfp927z

03/26/25 11:48 AM

#2714 RE: bigworld #2712

Bigworld, There's some logic to a tariff strategy, but they should have done it after the deficit reductions of the 'first 100 days'. Trying to do everything at once is too chaotic and disruptive, the financial markets freak out, corporations put their plans on hold, etc.

The deficit reduction is the policy that needed to be done quickly, before poilitical opposition could get organized. The immigration stuff could also be underway during the first 100 days. But trying to also do the tariffs at 'warp speed' is just too much chaos at once, and will produce a recession for sure.

Besides the timing, they should have done the tariffs one country at a time. Establish the 'template' with the first country, get that deal done, and then the rest of the countries know what is expected. The US' stated goal would be tariff 'reciprocity', with the requirement that the other country will reduce or eliminate their exisitng tariffs, and the US does the same. Doing it this way would avoid the chaotic aspects that have sent the economy / financial markets into a dangerous tailspin.

But it appears Trump sees tariffs as a permanent funding mechanism for the US, and as a way to bring manufacturing back to the US (ala Robert Lighthizer). But the amount of 'funding' will be negligible compared to the lost trillions from the economic chaos produced. On the manufacturiing side, the cost of labor in the US is much higher than in most of the world, so the tariffs would have to be high enough to overcome that differential, or it makes no financial sense for companies to put their manufacturing here. So permanent high tariffs would be needed to 'level the playing field', at the cost of much higher prices for the goods produced.

Also, the combined disruptions from all this turmoil could lead to another global financial crisis -- the pin that pops the balloon. Trump
is basically throwing a big wrench into the gears of a Swiss watch. The drive is on to reverse globalization and dependency upon the rest of the world, but a change this big and complex are bound to have unintended consequences.



---
icon url

gfp927z

03/26/25 2:19 PM

#2718 RE: bigworld #2712

Bigworld, It looks like the tariff angst is returning. Just curious if you grabbed the SVIX profits? The angst level likely increases going into the April 2 date next week, one would think.

Trump has forgotten the main rule with financial markets --> they hate uncertainty, and dragging things out just makes it worse. Not just the financial markets, but corporations need clarity, as do small businesses and consumers. Trump likes all the attention of having the spotlight on himself every day, but the endless drama is poisoning the market / economy. The hope is that April 2 will bring some resolution, but more likely Trump just doubles down on a seriously flawed strategy (?) Guess we'll find out.



---
icon url

gfp927z

03/27/25 2:38 PM

#2732 RE: bigworld #2712

Bigworld, The new 25% auto tariffs have lit a fire under the metals (again), with silver moving above 35, and gold looks like a run to 3100 is in the cards soon.

Btw, I usually don't follow Cramer much, but he pointed out that Trump is unlikely to back down on his tariffs, even if they clobber the stock market, since changing course would make him look bad / weak. We'll see what happens, but next week (April 2 deadline) should be interesting, to say the least.

I've got a bad feeling about this. Cramer sees a lousy stock market through the spring / summer, and that sounds about right, barring any significant changes to the Trump tariff plan. He needs to back away / change course, which will become more obvious as the stock market continues to fall, and economic numbers deteriorate.

At least the metals have been good hedges :o)



---
icon url

gfp927z

03/30/25 6:39 PM

#2782 RE: bigworld #2712

Bigworld, Looking at some conservative trading ideas, 5-10 year Treasuries might be interesting over the next year or so (as an alternative to stock or Vix trading). Trump and Bessent say they specifically want to get the 10 year Treasury yield lower (link below), so there could be some decent capital gains for patient investors. Fed % easing might not be coming until later in the year, but that should be another boost for 5-10 year bond prices.

Fwiw, I already have a 3-4 year Treasury bond ladder, so wasn't looking to add more buy / hold type bonds, but these 5-10 bonds would be for the capital gain aspect. Combined with their ongoing interest payments, they could have a decent total return over the next year or so. Stocks are usually the place to get capital gains, but when will the bottom arrive (?) Tough to say, so bonds might be an easier play. I was looking at 5-7 year individual Treasuries, or possibly an Intermediate term ETF like VGIT.


>>> Treasuries are the standout play as Trump’s trade war heats up <<<

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175995322


>>> ‘Don’t fight Bessent’s Treasury’ is new mantra in US bond market <<<

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175965892





---