News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mrmainstreet

03/24/25 3:30 PM

#434269 RE: shadolane #434267

Yeah unfortunately I agree with you. I was rah rah about voting Blue on the proxy because the dude had invested $100 million, and the previous ownership never bought shares, but clearly he's willing to screw us to get his money back.

@JRoon shareholder approval is not necessary to dilute, just like it's not necessary for a RS.
icon url

Skipperdog11

03/24/25 7:43 PM

#434274 RE: shadolane #434267

"And once the RS happens they will be able to sell shares to raise funds. One doesn't have to look too far to find companies which have done the same"

I would argue that one would have to look very far to find a case in which a company has executed a 1 for 20 and did not raise funds within a year of the RS.