Let’s take a simple (pretend) example.
In my opinion.
Because of spoofing price per share suppression, in 2019 LP has to sell 20 million instead of ten million shares to keep NWBO afloat.
Let’s say that dilutes the share price by that time period by x%
Now, let’s say NWBO wins their case years later, but, by that time, the pps is not .25 but 25.00.
To calculate the loss of profit, the pps 25.00 would need to be reimbursed by the x percent previously diluted.
Additionally, Multiply that loss by 1 to four times for punitive damages, and the loss of profit plus punitive damages per share gets higher.
In other words, it does not behoove NWBO to keep their price per share low as we now go forward should the court/jury eventually find long term impact on pps from the actions that occurred in years prior.
(Should defendants now try to continue price manipulation, NWBO would best be protected by an injunction, and additional lawsuits, not by keeping their price low)
I think NWBO has to do everything legally and ethically possible upon any approval to improve their share price and availability of treatment to patients.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
