It always seems to be a crapshoot when it comes to the legal avenue. The article Sleven posted which offered up the idea that it might be better for defendants to not use the patent invalidity defense, had a lot of ifs, maybe, possibly, and hedging that such decisions must be made on a case by case basis. Most of it related to jury trials, whereas you point out a trial with ruling by the judge. Hard to say. What is funny to me, is that you have the United States Patent Office which studies and grants these patents, and then we have a bunch of yokels - a good portion of which think the Sun revolves around the Earth and couldn't give you the cube root of 27, deciding which patents are valid or not.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
