Gentlemen, Okay, I give up. I thought the Hikma trial was about "Infringement?" So, how could Hikma be bringing up a case that was already decided in another court (DU)? I thought Amarin's Anchor Patents had already stood up in court? And that the Marine Patents were the ones overruled? From my one jury trial experience, we the jury could not ask questions about previous judgements or speculate about something that was not formally being presented at the trial. If we're being challenged again about our Patents this is a real travesty of our court system. "Anyone at anytime can sue anyone with anything?" This has to stop, this is anarchy.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
