News Focus
News Focus
icon url

XMaster2023

03/12/25 10:40 PM

#753933 RE: HyGro #753931

Hygro, what the F are you talking about? MRNA vaccines? Not even close to what I was discussing.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

norisknorewards

03/12/25 10:41 PM

#753935 RE: HyGro #753931

Anything but safe dcvax, amiright?

So weird to hate on something so hard that you allegedly have nothing to do with
icon url

XMaster2023

03/13/25 12:40 AM

#753941 RE: HyGro #753931

What I was taking about is Immune response Assessment of treatment. Today, we don’t have to wait years to see if the treatment is working. The most recent clinical trials are;
* Analyzing blood samples to evaluate the patient's immune response to the vaccine.
* Measuring the levels of specific immune cells, such as T cells, and assessing their ability to recognize and attack tumor cells.
* Evaluating the presence of specific antibodies that attack the tumor.
* Analyzing T-cell responses:
* Because DCVax-L is a immunotherapy, a large part of the monitoring involves seeing if the patients T-cells are responding to the glioblastoma.

I was also talking about Combination trials with DCVax-L.

A lot has changed in the last 3 years.

But somehow you thought I was talking about mRNA vaccines?
icon url

2B_unknown

03/13/25 9:07 AM

#753960 RE: HyGro #753931

HyGro,

"Yes, mRNA vaccines are looking very promising."

Yes, when used WITH DCVAX.

TBU
icon url

polska

03/13/25 9:49 AM

#753965 RE: HyGro #753931

Yes, mRNA vaccines are very promising if you like residual plasmid DNA contamination, SV40 (a DNA sequence that is a known cancer promoter), and toxic lipid nanoparticles. Oncologists are already reporting "a spike" in accelerated cancers in younger age groups.