Back in January the line was drawn, if there's no news by the end of February I'm going to be very concerned. ONE DAY LATER, based on an anonymous internet poster, the can was kicked to March.
As I've stated many times, her can is so damaged from being kicked it's now the size of a ping-pong ball.
No, I’m already mildly concerned at the decision pace, although MHRA’s email response to muee88 (see below) a month ago temporarily removed most of my concern and is keeping me optimistic for now. I’m just done posting after April 7, 2025 if no DCVax-l approval(s) by then. I can’t move any alleged goalpost from there.
muee88 Re: Red_Right_Hand post# 747434 Tuesday, 02/04/2025 12:32:38 PM Recent response [February 3, 2025] from the MHRA regarding the status of the DCVax application:
“We understand and support the need for treatments for glioblastomas and are actively working to ensure all medicines filed are safe, effective, and manufactured with appropriate quality standards, and subsequently reach patients as rapidly as possible.
In our role we are responsible for licensing medicines and ensuring that both medicines and medical devices work and are acceptably safe.
As you have already seen, the company has announced that they have submitted their application to us. We are working actively on this application, recognising the impact this medicine could potentially have.
Finally, please be assured we a progressing this application as rapidly as possible and in collaboration with the company.”