Jetmek,
You keep repeating the same deflection while avoiding the core issue: Why won’t DBMM take action to expose the truth?
1️⃣ Your Excuse:
"I don't believe there are naked shorts, so I won’t push DBMM to act."
❌ That’s irrelevant. If you were so certain, you’d be begging DBMM to prove it once and for all, just to shut down the discussion. Yet, you’re terrified of the company actually trying. Why?
2️⃣ Your Deflection:
"Why don’t YOU call DBMM?"
❌ This isn’t about me. It’s about DBMM’s inaction. If management truly believed there were no naked shorts, they would have proven it years ago and ended the debate. Instead, they stay silent—just like the short sellers need them to.
3️⃣ The Simple Truth:
🔹 A preferred share dividend forces transparency—no manipulation, no excuses.
🔹 DBMM’s refusal to act is suspicious—either they don’t know how, or they don’t want to.
🔹 If you truly believed there were no naked shorts, you’d be calling for DBMM to prove it instead of fighting me.
So answer this: If DBMM could instantly end the naked short debate with a simple corporate action, why won’t they do it?
Until you address that, your entire argument is just noise.
Krombacher