Jetmek,
You’re overcomplicating this. Let’s strip it down to the core issue—Why hasn’t DBMM taken action to prove there are no naked shorts?
Your argument is that I need to contact DBMM. But that’s irrelevant because DBMM’s management should already be acting in shareholders’ best interests without my involvement.
The Real Issue:
1️⃣ If DBMM has no naked shorts, then issuing a preferred share dividend immediately shuts down the debate. If DBMM is clean, what do they have to lose?
2️⃣ If DBMM has naked shorts, then they have every incentive to take action and force a squeeze.
So again, why aren’t they doing it? If DBMM is a legitimate company with shareholder interests in mind, why wouldn’t they take the simplest possible step to settle this once and for all?
Your Deflection:
🔹 Instead of answering why DBMM won’t act, you keep trying to make this about me.
🔹 Whether I contact DBMM or not is irrelevant—it’s DBMM’s job to defend its shareholders.
🔹 You claim you’d support action but won’t push for it. Why? Because deep down, you know DBMM’s silence is suspicious.
So, I’ll ask again:
🔹 If DBMM has no naked shorts, why not prove it?
🔹 If DBMM doesn’t act, what does that tell you?
No distractions, no excuses—just answer why DBMM refuses to do the one thing that would end this debate instantly.
Krombacher
Market Data 
Markets 
