Replies to post #358612 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Krombacher]

Jetmek,

You just laid out the exact reasons why a preferred share dividend should be issued. Either:

1️⃣ DBMM has no naked shorts, in which case, issuing a preferred share dividend proves it once and for all and eliminates the debate forever.

2️⃣ DBMM has naked shorts, but management is somehow complicit or aligned with them—which would explain their refusal to act.

If you truly believe the first scenario, then you should be demanding DBMM issue the dividend to shut down the conversation for good. But instead, you entertain conspiracy theories about DBMM management protecting naked short sellers—which is far worse than anything I’ve suggested.

Let’s put this to the test:
✅ If DBMM issues a preferred share dividend and nothing happens, you were right—no shorts exist.
✅ If DBMM issues a preferred share dividend and shorts scramble to cover, then everything I’ve said was correct.
✅ But if DBMM refuses to issue a preferred share dividend, despite it being the simplest way to expose the truth, then we have our answer: They don’t want to expose the short position.

So, which is it?

Either DBMM’s management is:
🔹 Incompetent (for failing to take action that benefits shareholders)
🔹 Complicit (for working with the shorts)
🔹 Or trapped (because the problem is too big for them to handle)

You claim you “have no idea” if management is in bed with short sellers, but if they refuse to act, then you do have an answer.

So I’ll ask again: If DBMM was certain there were no naked shorts, why not prove it?

Krombacher