So in the end, it's the same number of shares going out the door.
So the "massive dilution" you reference is the SAME, whether Advent is paid in shares, or someone buys the shares to provide the cash to pay the bills from the company. So there is no benefit to LP to keep the share price down. In fact, her personal share count is also being diluted, in order to pay the bills.
You can’t be serious Senti.
It’s not the same amount of shares if the stock price is higher. The higher the price, the less shares it is. If Linda owes Linda $100 and the stock price is $0.25 and wants to pay it in shares, it takes 400 shares to square up Linda. If the stock price is $1, it only takes 100 shares.
So Linda, thinking the stock price is going to get to $10 anyway, would naturally rather the price be $0.25 rather than $1, so she can get paid 400 shares and have $4000 later, rather than get paid 100 shares and only have $1000 later.
So again, you are wrong. Dilution is not the same. We’d be diluting much less if Linda had motive to get the share price up. But she doesn’t. She has incentive to keep the share price as low as possible, so she (Advent) can get as many shares as possible.
Additionally, the fact that Advent is willing to be paid in shares indicates... to me anyway... that they, Advent, are confident those shares will be worth more in the future.
It’s not Advent. It’s Linda. Linda is Advent. She is giving herself more shares. Her personal share count is not being diluted, it’s growing substantially.
It’s insane you can’t grasp what is going on here.
So who negotiated the Advent contract with whom ? What are the terms of the contract? How much per treatment goes to whom ? How much of revenue from specials went to whom and under what terms ? No we don't miss any point .
that is a good thing, because many vendors on this planet are not willing to take shares as payment from a biotech without a revenue stream. And if Advent wasn't taking shares as payment, then they would want cash, so Northwest would have to sell those same shares for cash to those willing and able to buy them from the company
Yes Linda is a master negotiator when she is dealing with Linda. You cant be serious here Senti.
So the "massive dilution" you reference is the SAME, whether Advent is paid in shares, or someone buys the shares to provide the cash to pay the bills from the company. So there is no benefit to LP to keep the share price down. In fact, her personal share count is also being diluted, in order to pay the bills.
her personal share count is also being diluted? Is that why she has been sued in the true up case because her personal share count is also being diluted? The true up case is not looking good for Linda so lets hope your prediction (personal share count is also being diluted) will come to pass.