Well, thanks for talking about it. I’ll give you props for that. It’s amazing that you are just about the only person willing to talk about the two biggest issues that will determine the company’s progress this year.
To be clear - I didn’t say it would take forever. I just said they’re big issues. Remember, I have a short term perspective. I look for any reason to get excited over the next year. These are two big issues from that perspective.
Meaning they are big unknowns and could take a long time to resolve. That disqualifies it from being a stock to get excited about any time in the near future. In other words, traders will go the other way because there’s nothing to get excited about.
X is trying to push the buyout in a short amount of time because he wants to dangle the carrot for the near term, but it won’t work for traders. Way to unknown. It may keep some of you hanging on though.
Regarding the foundries , I allow that perhaps they’ve made progress that will shorten the time for others, but I’ve pointed out the fact that none of the other foundries replicated it. NONE. That suggests to me that they don’t want to or it’s hard or both. That will likely be the same issue with the preferred foundries.
You guys can keep dreaming and being positive and maybe it will work out. But I think you’re learning - albeit very slowly - this is not the guaranteed technology of the future that people here have wanted to believe. The hurdles are vast and deep.
Photonics on the other hand may well be near guarantee. But that doesn’t mean polymers will be. Some here seem to not even know the difference.Clearly, polymers are far less predictable than the company has led shareholders to believe.
Good luck
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
