You are once again clueless about a S-1.
"As you know, FORW has made several investments, all of which need to be addressed or removed in some form. Withdrawing the S-1 could be a simple and efficient way to start that process."
Sharp invested in two scams Ligand and Maverick - he supposedly loaned FORW $2 Million to purchase warrants from the scam HUMBL - but when it was time to exercise the warrants they weren't close to the strike price.
Withdrawing the S-1 has absolutely nothing to do with the shady acquisitions.
You don't seem to understand how OTC scams operate. Sharp filed a lawsuit against HUMBL and Foote over the warrants and oddly it was settled in two weeks and they included the scammers 3(a)10 exemption scheme meaning any stock awarded in the settlement would be immediately free trading.
A S-1 doesn't clean the slate FORW still has the baggage from Bill Schaefer when he and Sharp got into bed.
Damn, you are embarrassing yourself - "business focus before revisiting the idea of an IPO"
FORW is already trading and a IPO is for exchange traded stocks and FORW doesn't meet the listing requirements for any exchange.
It has been over a year since Sharp filed the S-1 and it was obvious that Sharp understood that it would never pass comments.
Here is more of your nonsense - "On the flip side, WNFT and SRNW seem to be on much firmer ground."
WNFT has been hijacked 3 times and doesn't have a Form 211 filed. SRNW doesn't have a 211 filed with FINRA and it is extremely difficult to get FINRA to process a 211 for a hijacked shell.
It has been over 3 years for the hijacked shells and Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value.
Since the initial pump on FORW the price is down 99%.
IG