Replies to post #481002 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Yki]

I am bullish and got a lot of shares.
After the peer rewiev was published I asked a professori friend of mine to give his view on the paper.
He was rather convinced also for the findings but was sceptical about several authors previous connections to the company.
I wonder if anyone wondered the same?

[sab63090]

Steady T

Your words about scrutiny seem to be what he pointed out....so here comes Clock Stop 1 which I personally did not expect....boi568 did warn about this as did Investor and Doc328.....yeah, I remain a student here!

I forgot how long does that go....210 days?

Seems like a very long and painful journey!

[Bourbon_on_my_cornflakes]

Role of the 58 Authors: Of course all 58 authors did not contribute equally to the paper. That intuitively obvious. Each author contributed his or hers area of expertise. What is important is that the 58 people put their signature and reputation on that paper.

Yes, if you know doctors, especially academic and top tier doctors, they have great interest in being cited on research papers. (my MD daughter did a case study paper last week). So having 58 people anxious to have their name attached to this paper says a lot about the importance of the issue and the quality of the results.