News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Reefrad

01/18/25 8:14 PM

#744396 RE: HyGro #744367

All this knowledge because of your pseudoGBM diagnosis? That's quite an interesting story. GBMer turned abscess turned biotech guru. Wow.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

01/18/25 8:58 PM

#744398 RE: HyGro #744367

And two weeks before the trial endpoint, NWBO knew they would fail the trial.


Could you tell us when the date when you think this all happened?

CAR-T has been a financial disaster


So did you buy or short KITE or Bluebird Bio back in the day when everyone thought it was the next great thing?
icon url

Roman516

01/19/25 11:07 PM

#744478 RE: HyGro #744367

NoGro,

NWBO and FDA agreed that PFS for DCVax-L is nothing compared to the "OS" results for DCVax-L.
Case closed, move on since your comments and opinions are old news repeat, repeat, and repeat.
Good news on the horizon and multiple changes for a number of federal agencies, IMPO.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

CherryTree1

01/22/25 6:40 AM

#744816 RE: HyGro #744367

That is a complete mischaracterization how what occurred Hy . . . complete bullshit.
NWBO recognized that PFS didn't work as an end point a decade ago soon after the trial started and they saw tumors increase in size initially due to the infiltration of immune systems cells killing the cancer that was being mistook for tumor Progression vs PFS.(Progression Free Survival).
The trial end point shifted to overall survival and to compare to other external trial data mainly because much of the placebo control group they lost or was corrupted by the crossover provision where they could crossover after Progression so Overall Survival would be altered (bettered due to DCVAX)
The modification to the endpoints where made before any trial data was visible to them.

By itself, an endpoint modification is not problematic because a clinical trial is a coalescence of ideas and midstream changes. However, a noted change in and of itself raises a perception of bias in an active trial that is open and accruing and even more so in a trial that has completed accrual.


By itself, an endpoint modification is not problematic because a clinical trial is a coalescence of ideas and midstream changes. However, a noted change in and of itself raises a perception of bias in an active trial that is open and accruing and even more so in a trial that has completed accrual.
Bullish
Bullish