News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sumbuysumsell

01/18/25 11:30 AM

#480856 RE: DrJan #480854

Changing common beliefs in the face of new science can be challenging for several reasons:

Cognitive Bias: People tend to hold onto existing beliefs due to cognitive biases like confirmation bias, where they seek out information that supports their current views and disregard information that contradicts them.
Social and Cultural Influence: Many beliefs are deeply rooted in cultural, societal, and familial contexts. Changing these beliefs may challenge social norms or threaten one’s identity within a group.
Emotional Investment: People often have emotional ties to long-held beliefs, and new information that contradicts these beliefs can provoke feelings of fear, anxiety, or anger, leading to resistance.
Trust in Authority: Many people rely on authority figures (such as experts, media, or institutions) to shape their understanding. If the new scientific evidence contradicts trusted sources or established institutions, people may be hesitant to accept it.
Misunderstanding or Misinterpretation of Science: Science is complex, and many people may not fully understand the nuances of new findings. Without clear communication or simplified explanations, the scientific message may be misunderstood or dismissed.
Pace of Change: Scientific discoveries often evolve gradually, while deeply held beliefs are often more entrenched. The slow pace of scientific progress can make it hard for new information to compete with existing beliefs.
Fear of Change: Changing beliefs can be uncomfortable, especially when it involves reconsidering deeply ingrained concepts. Some people fear that adopting new beliefs might create confusion or disrupt their worldview.
Ideological or Political Factors: Scientific findings may conflict with political or ideological views, causing individuals or groups to reject them outright, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Media and Misinformation: Misinformation or misleading media narratives can distort scientific findings, making it difficult for the public to discern reliable information from falsehoods, leading to widespread skepticism.
Groupthink: When a belief is widely shared within a community, groupthink can occur, where individuals suppress their own doubts and align with the collective view. Breaking away from this consensus can be challenging.
These challenges make it essential for science communication to be clear, transparent, and sensitive to the social and psychological factors influencing people's beliefs.
icon url

poguemahone

01/18/25 11:33 AM

#480857 RE: DrJan #480854

I think you have hit the nail on the head. The news headlines about a small unknown company finding a better treatment for ALZ sound incredible. Then someone hears Missling talk and the reaction is a collective “there is no way this idiot could possibly have developed a better treatment for Alzheimers.”

We do need a better corporate presence and spokesperson for this company than Missling. He has ZERO charisma and has no ability to clearly and concisely communicate. This has been—and continues to be—a major problem.
icon url

boi568

01/18/25 11:35 AM

#480858 RE: DrJan #480854

Like you
icon url

williamssc

01/18/25 11:38 AM

#480859 RE: DrJan #480854

Funny accent?? You need to get out more. Missling is European getting a drug approved in Europe, I call that smart. Equitable means affordable to more people which the mabs are certainly not.
icon url

sab63090

01/18/25 12:46 PM

#480880 RE: DrJan #480854

Dr. Jan.......Excellent

BTW, my wife is German and certainly speaks a better German than I do and sometimes even better English than me, but we will be married for 60 years in June
icon url

frrol

01/18/25 7:28 PM

#480919 RE: DrJan #480854

It was a healthcare investor conference, so I suspect the attendees understood the "control" for p-val calc was the delayed arm.

(Btw agree Missling's DEI jargoneering is eye-rolling :-) )