Replies to post #39420 on Raadr Inc (RDAR)

[HoldEm777]

When posting facts and information from filings is considered being negative you have to consider who is calling it negative and their ego and agenda. Why has no one countered in debate proving the information false by providing links etc?
So now provide a list for why people support complete bullshit scams like this one. Thanks

[BigBadWolf]

Calling a stock a "complete bullshit scam" often reflects strong emotions or a biased perspective, rather than a balanced analysis. Here are some possible reasons why someone might use such language, even when the stock has both risks and rewards:

Frustration Over Losses
Investors who have lost money on the stock may use extreme language out of anger or disappointment, especially if they feel misled by management or market hype.

Confirmation Bias
Once someone forms a negative opinion, they might selectively focus on information that supports their viewpoint, ignoring any potential rewards or positives.

Mistrust of Management or Business Practices
If the company has a history of questionable decisions, broken promises, or regulatory issues, critics might label it a scam, even if the company has legitimate operations.

Misuse of Terminology
Some people throw around terms like "scam" loosely to express skepticism or disdain, even when there’s no evidence of fraud or deception.

Emotional Manipulation or Trolling
Such comments might be intended to provoke a reaction, stir controversy, or discourage other investors, rather than provide genuine insight.

Perceived Imbalance of Risk vs. Reward
If someone perceives the risks as overwhelmingly outweighing the potential rewards, they might exaggerate to emphasize their viewpoint.

While their perspective might have some basis in fact, labeling a stock as a "scam" dismisses the complexities of investing. Every stock carries a mix of risks and opportunities. The key for investors is to critically evaluate such comments, assess the credibility of the source, and conduct their own research before making decisions.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175670684&txt2find=fund

[BigBadWolf]

Decide which best explains that which is clearly visible on $RDAR's everywhere for yourselves

Personal Bias or Frustration:
They may have had a negative experience with the stock, such as losing money, and their posts reflect their frustration or bias.

Desire for Attention:
Negative posts tend to draw more engagement due to their emotionally charged nature. This can make posters feel validated or "heard."

Discouraging Retail Investors:
In some cases, negative posters may aim to discourage small investors to consolidate holdings among institutional players or their own interests.

Trolling or Emotional Manipulation:
Some individuals enjoy provoking reactions or creating emotional responses without having a genuine stake in the stock or discussion.

As I have said before a Balanced perspectives are valuable on stock boards because every investment has both risks and opportunities. It’s essential to critically evaluate the credibility of each ___________ and their potential motivations, while also conducting your own due diligence.as it's your $ your decision(s)

The Good The Bad The Ugly
Let us also remember there are No OTC saviors who give a damn about you or any others here.. Fact