Replies to post #479749 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Investor2014]

What 50 docs?

I'll stick with the opinions of the 50 Doc's who did the reviewing.

There was a whole bunch of site investigators listed, but not because they were reviewing.

There would have been a couple of peer reviewers and we don't know who they were, nor doesn't matter much.

[sab63090]

k9uwa
I'm in the same position as you when it comes to following those who are important figures in this area like Dr. Sabbagh and others as opposed to those who apparently don't believe him! It's hard for me because I don't have the background, but you have to have faith in people who not only excel in their profession but know, in detail, what they endorse! Not only does it reflect their expertise, but also their reputation....I assume that those who approve medications listen to those people, especially when there are many (50+) all scientists who specialize in this area!

So, I can't even try to debate with those who say it's not good since I am UNQUALIFIED to do so....I have to accept information received from expert scientists as true.

That's not to say that the short interests will not try hard to protect their money and have the mm's to help.