Why do you need to lie to disparage the presentation?
I don't.
The presentation does that for itself.
Presenting the failed original primary endpoint data as the first results slide was an egregious offense to shareholders. Should never have happened. That is exactly what happened, and that is what I am saying. You can try to candy paint it and call me a liar as much as you want.
The very first slide that showed results, had results showing that the original primary endpoint failed. Period. Not debatable. I'm sure you'll try to debate me anyway. And you'll be wrong. As usual.
jeez flipper the NYC was not a science conference it was a presentation for everyone interested in investing in NWBO, what part of what FeMike said here is it that you don't get:
"Nobody is going to wait until the end of a presentation to act on a binary event when the first slide they see says "failed to meet primary endpoint". Doesn't matter what is said after that, people are immediately scrambling to exit their positions."
Femike is not disputing whether DCVAXL is working for patients or not, it is, that is why he is still invested and that is why I am still invested.