News Focus
News Focus
icon url

prototype_101

01/06/25 11:51 AM

#208675 RE: prototype_101 #208427

teddybear trying Magician's trick of MISDIRECTION, won't work!!!! your posts are all PURE BS conjecture, twisting and contorting of ANYTHING and EVERYTHING said by Lebby in News Releases, Presentations, Industry Articles, etc, and the same goes for the twisted game you run on ANY Long who engages with you!!! You are a joke!!!

NOW WITHOUT PIVOTING >>>> SHOW ME ANY CONCRETE PROOF TO STAND UP AGAINST THE FACTS I HAVE SHOWN BELOW!!!

YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!!! AND THAT IS THE HEART AND SOUL OF YOUR WHOLE STINKING ARGUMENT!!!!

teddybear's 4x200 PIC "not ready" claims TOTALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING as usual!!!!


teddybear was originally trying to use ASM Slide #29 to prove that the 4x200 PIC was still in "Development", but I TOTALLY DESTROYED him on that FALSE CLAIM, so then teddybear shifted his deceptive spiel to claim it was actually only Lebby's words that mattered NOT what was actually being presented on Slide #29 in relation to the COLOR CODED Legend at the Top of Slide #29

Ok, so let's do this in TWO PARTS, first I will DESTROY teddybear on the Slide #29 claim he originally was hanging his hat on, and then I will DESTROY teddybear on his shifted claim that all that mattered was what Lebby said in relation to what was portrayed on Slide #29

PART 1 - teddybear Slide #29 claim that the 4x200 was still "IN DEVELOPMENT" based on what is SHOWN ON SLIDE #29

The ASM Slide #29 EXTREMELY CLEARLY USING COLOR CODING shows that the 4x200 PIC is IN QUALIFICATIONS back in May 2024 exactly as expected!!!The COLOR CODING LEGEND is found at the top of the chart

teddybear points out these two FACTS in your own post here

1) I trust Dr Lebby's words over the graph. I see what you are saying about the colors in the graph but why even include "in development" in the legend if none of them are still in development? At any rate Dr Lebby's words clearly say they are working on the PIC and packaging still.

In that same post you also correctly point out that PkM-6 Series is IN QUALIFICATIONS here
2) He singles out Series 6 as being by saying "THAT ONE is in qualification".

But teddybear, even an UNTRAINED MONKEY can look at Slide #29 and see for themselves that the COLOR CODING of the 4x200 PIC is IDENTICAL to the COLOR CODING of the PkM-6 Series


PART 2 - teddybear Slide #29 claim that the 4x200 was still "IN DEVELOPMENT" based on what was said by Lebby about the 4x200 PIC when talking about Slide #29

teddybear said, I trust Dr Lebby's words over the graph. I see what you are saying about the colors in the graph but why even include "in development" in the legend if none of them are still in development? At any rate Dr Lebby's words clearly say they are working on the PIC and packaging still.

He singles out Series 6 as being by saying "THAT ONE is in qualification". All he says about the PIC is "4 lanes is coming" - which CLEARLY to anyone with a brain means it isn't ready. And for packaging he says they are "working on that as well" which means packaging isn't ready either
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175527117

What teddybear obviously does NOT understand is the FACT that Lebby could have shuffled all 3 of those quotes to ANY of the 3 line items on that Slide #29 and that is a FACT, because when IN QUALIFICATIONS there is an ongoing work being done to progress the component to perfection before it becomes QUALIFIED, yes, this is a PROCESS, and therefore it is correct to say that while undergoing Qualifications that the actual Qualification "is coming" and also while undergoing Qualifications that the actual Qualification is being "worked on that as well"

Gemini, when a modulator is in qualifications with a Transceiver maker are changes ever made to perfect the performance metrics?

Yes, during modulator qualifications with a transceiver maker, changes are often made to perfect performance metrics. Here's why:

Tight Specifications: Transceivers operate within very stringent performance parameters. Even minor deviations can significantly impact data transmission quality and reliability.

Optimization for Specific Applications: Different applications (e.g., data centers, telecommunications) have unique requirements. Modulators may need adjustments to optimize for factors like data rate, power consumption, and operating temperature.

Iterative Process: Qualification is often an iterative process. Initial testing may reveal areas for improvement in the modulator's performance. The manufacturer then makes adjustments (e.g., tweaking bias voltages, refining manufacturing processes) and re-tests to achieve the desired results.

Collaboration: Close collaboration between the modulator manufacturer and the transceiver maker is crucial. The transceiver maker provides feedback on the modulator's performance within their system, and the modulator manufacturer uses this feedback to refine their product.
Common Performance Metrics that may be adjusted during qualification:


Extinction Ratio (ER): The difference between the "on" and "off" states of the optical signal. Higher ER generally means better signal quality.

Bit Error Rate (BER): The rate at which errors occur in the transmitted data. Lower BER is essential for reliable data transmission.

Rise/Fall Times: How quickly the optical signal transitions between the "on" and "off" states. Faster transitions enable higher data rates.

Linearity: How well the modulator's output power varies linearly with the input signal. Linearity is crucial for accurate signal transmission.

Power Consumption: Modulators should consume as little power as possible to improve energy efficiency.

By working together and making necessary adjustments, modulator manufacturers and transceiver makers can ensure that the final product meets the demanding performance requirements of modern communication systems.
Bullish
Bullish