News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ignatiusrielly35

12/10/24 10:31 PM

#476498 RE: kund #476496

You seem resigned to an approval but your sponsor wants you to sell people on a delay, huh? Interesting. At least you got it half correct. 
icon url

williamssc

12/10/24 10:38 PM

#476499 RE: kund #476496

Ok. EMA is cautious and Blarcamesine approval likely. Hows that.
icon url

Steady_T

12/10/24 11:34 PM

#476506 RE: kund #476496

Guess again Kund.

FDA NDA timeline is 6 months for AA and 10 months for regular filings.
icon url

sab63090

12/11/24 4:15 AM

#476516 RE: kund #476496

I believe you thought the MAA Filing would not happen, now you think the shorts are waiting comfortably to break the bullish hope for a faster acceptance and approval, which could be wrong especially since the team has supplied EVERYTHING that would/might be required, except for these unknown "clock stops"....what a silly way to handle things on a manufactured time delay process, especially when the needs are great & well known and $$$ COSTLY to the healthcare systems around the world.

I agree that there are risks....to both sides

Yeah, we'll see in a few weeks I presume.