News Focus
News Focus
icon url

underpar71

12/03/24 11:47 AM

#735329 RE: flipper44 #735327

I supposed this is good to have on the record and in support by case ruling. Does it delay a response by the Magistrate now? Or, just added to the files? And/or does this now add time for a response by defendants?
icon url

fluteman

12/03/24 12:05 PM

#735335 RE: flipper44 #735327

Aggressive!
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

dennisdave

12/03/24 12:27 PM

#735341 RE: flipper44 #735327

thats a great way to response by Posner
However timeline-wise now the Defendant will be granted the opportunity to respond which will cause more delay.
icon url

H2R

12/03/24 2:09 PM

#735377 RE: flipper44 #735327

The Defendant Strategy Backfires!

Thanks Flipper, this is quite the filing.

In briefing their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants repeatedly referred to the allegations in Phunware as “identical” (Mot. to Dismiss at 1 and 13), and a “mirror image of this case” (Mot. to Dismiss at 2), urging this Court to follow Phunware’s “on-point precedent” regarding “materially identical spoofing allegations.”



I wonder how the MM's legal eagles will wiggle out of this filing!

Best of luck to Patients, NWBO, and Longs!
Bullish
Bullish