I supposed this is good to have on the record and in support by case ruling. Does it delay a response by the Magistrate now? Or, just added to the files? And/or does this now add time for a response by defendants?
thats a great way to response by Posner However timeline-wise now the Defendant will be granted the opportunity to respond which will cause more delay.
In briefing their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants repeatedly referred to the allegations in Phunware as “identical” (Mot. to Dismiss at 1 and 13), and a “mirror image of this case” (Mot. to Dismiss at 2), urging this Court to follow Phunware’s “on-point precedent” regarding “materially identical spoofing allegations.”
I wonder how the MM's legal eagles will wiggle out of this filing!