News Focus
News Focus
icon url

learningcurve2020

11/22/24 3:50 PM

#34899 RE: Phantom Lord #34896

If the treatment is showing good efficacy it should be a cinch to enroll such small numbers.  So it begs the question, why would they sabotage their own company? 
icon url

CorsairNavigator20

11/22/24 3:54 PM

#34900 RE: Phantom Lord #34896

Were you able to ask about data subsets. My line of conjecture would be they saw a commonality in patients with good outcomes, approached the FDA to narrow the indication and had to increase sample size. Only positive reason why it's taking forever. Yes that will really change the future of this company. Just trying to keep a positive spin. Were you able to get them to talk data at all or tell you it is going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
icon url

microcapbiotech

11/29/24 3:31 PM

#34925 RE: Phantom Lord #34896

"Originally the trial was supposed to enroll 37 patients. No reason it should not be fully enrolled by now at 37 patients. The next data release better be at least 30 patients. There is no excuse for anything less than that."
I HOPE THAT YOU ARE CORRECT. Any excuse after this much time to enroll will just be BS.
Bullish
Bullish