If there’s one thing I care about is my credibility and integrity, so... when you call me a basher or insinuate that I don't know my stuff, you've crossed the line…
I had a nice long post with quotes and everything ready to send yesterday, but Ihub crashed for hours (at least for me)
I said I didn't care what Hicks did or did not do, like years ago... What I'm referring to has been happening for years, but it is still ongoing to this day!
To set the record straight: according to the details in the Schedule 13G filing, Stephen M. Hicks does not directly own any shares of the Issuer’s common stock. Let’s clear up that fact once and for all.
Your take on Hicks not directly owning any shares is beyond laughable. That’s boilerplate text found on pretty much every 13G/D, Form 3, 4 beneficial ownership disclosure, it doesn't mean anything, ultimately these are all controlled by Hicks.
Not usual for me to brag about myself, but I can’t let you attack my credibility like that…
I have more SEC rules and regulations knowledge than probably anybody you've interacted with in your life... (Unless you know a Securities Counsel or the like)
I have reviewed more than 100,000 SEC filings and as many OTC fillings, I have conducted Due Diligence on over 2500 OTC stocks... I have discussed with hundreds of CEOs, exchanged with OTC Markets a hundred times. I have been praised by more than one CEO as to how well I know my stuff. One of the best, and most retail friendly custodians (Not George Sharp btw LOL), has suggested to me that I become a custodian too, because of how well I know SEC, FINRA, SOS, OTCM processes etc.
It’s not true at all that non-SEC reporting issuers have no way to issue unrestricted shares, from the get-go. Regulation A is available for the issuance of free trading shares after a 1-A is deemed qualified following SEC review.
Also, you forgot about convertible notes, these leads to immediately sellable shares once converted, IF the notes have been held for more than 1 Year (for non-SEC-reporting issuer). You can also have the possibility of a court approved 3(a)(10) settlement, which is another way to issue free trading shares.
When a lender mentions "in the aggregate principal amount equal to $689,486.00", that isn't solely the principal on note issuance, that represents, principal + interest + a bunch of bullshit fees... I know this, because I made thousands of calculations related to convertible notes and share issuance and the amount converted rarely ever equals the Outstanding principal + interest accrued (Some issuers, like BOMO, do list some other conversion related fees. (Several times on CZNI/BOMO btw, and several other stocks where Hicks was involved)
You are clueless, you are the one who still can't comprehend the filing so don’t laugh too hard. Schedule 13G role all the way down under EXHIBIT 1 JOINT FILING AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 13d-1(k)
A Joint Filing Agreement under Rule 13d-1(k) allows multiple parties to file a single Schedule 13G jointly. In this case, Trillium Partners LP, Maple Leaf Capital Management LLC, and Stephen M. Hicks agree that their combined Schedule 13G represents their collective holdings.
Yes, and? What's your point? All these entities are still ultimately controlled by Hicks, he's the one having the final say...
This is exactly how you come across as a basher manipulating people’s perceptions. No, I don’t follow CZNI/BOMO. If you’re so confident in what you’re saying, why don’t you provide a link or a record of all Stephen Hicks, to back up your claims? Calling Trillium a "toxic lender" is a bit of an oversimplification. Let’s see some proof if you’re so sure of it.
If you are still believing that nonsense after how the stock traded recently… I have no words…
If you had taken the time to look at CZNI/BOMO last few fillings, and checked the shares outstanding increase over that time period, you wouldn't say that calling Hicks a Toxic lender is an oversimplification...
Once again, I’ve pointed out all the wrongdoings by Hicks in the past, including linking to the SEC fines, so it’s clear I’m not defending him. On the other hand, you’re using Hicks’ history to bash the stock. Your first post here was bashing, and all your posts after that. The basher books their first post normally starts out with something similar to this approach. "I sincerely wish I didn't buy any shares at 0.0050$..." LMAO.
Yes, you point to his distant past wrongdoing, but you are completely denying his recent past and present wrongdoing (sure not charge by SEC, but who cares, it is what happens to stocks he is involved with that matters)
Whether you personally believe me or not, I bought even more shares today... I have over 1m shares now (Might be small for you, but that's enough risk for me, for a stock with constant bid dumping by OTCN...) Actually, every single day, I averaged down, when the stock was down more than 30%, and I’m still down on my position, right now… Easily the worst dumping I’ve ever witnessed, first hand…
Once again, don’t try to sway people with information they don’t know. Instead of asking us to search for it, why can’t you post the link and information here? How can you accusing the man dumping stock when Stephen M. Hicks does not directly own any shares of the Issuer’s common stock? Stephen M. Hicks serves as the Manager of the General Partner (GP) at Maple Leaf Capital Management LLC. His role involves overseeing various investments and managing responsibilities for the firm, which operates as part of a joint filing agreement alongside Trillium Partners LP, a Delaware-based entity, as outlined in SEC filings.
You think you know that kind of stuff because you've been at it for that many years... The number of years at something doesn't necessarily correlate with the amount of knowledge gained.
Your DD about the business operation etc is more than fine, but your knowledge of rules and regulations is severely lacking…
The fact remains that Hicks can and will sell shares of these entities whenever he feels like it
This is not a good medium for me to share stuff
I suggest you or other member just DM me on "X" if you want more information about Hicks or if you have questions about rules and regulations
Buying this stock while OTCN is still on LII, and also while there is little chance that they'll be able to fill the Q3 on time to stay Pink Current, because of the ongoing change of control, wasn't my best move, though...🤦
@MaxInvestor89
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
