News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ilovetech

11/05/24 10:48 PM

#730638 RE: skitahoe #730637

Perhaps it's time Merck call the manipulating dogs off, so the SP could run to that level.

What a company, one that knows her number, would say is, let's talk when your share price is approach half of what you're demanding.

icon url

RobotDroid

11/05/24 10:50 PM

#730639 RE: skitahoe #730637

Hopium.
icon url

Gus1212

11/05/24 11:03 PM

#730640 RE: skitahoe #730637

Merck may wait but someone else may jump and leave Merck in the dust.

After all how many years of revenue do all solid tumors bring in?

Or do all the Pharam's just sit still, watch Merck dominate, and leave them behind?

MERCK SHOULD AND WILL JUMP SOONER THAN SOME THINK!

just my humble opinion LOL
icon url

martyDg

11/06/24 12:50 AM

#730644 RE: skitahoe #730637

No company would pay that sort of premium. What a company, one that knows her number, would say is, let's talk when your share price is approach half of what you're demanding.



Pure BS...I don't believe that's the case. What if the share price reaches $5 upon approval? What would Merck do then? Would they prefer to pay a $5 premium now instead of a $10 premium later? Think think think...
icon url

rizona

11/06/24 9:23 AM

#730682 RE: skitahoe #730637

Gary,

Your last sentence is dumb. If the stock is trading publicly at $5, why would anyone, including BP, pay $10 unless they were buying out the company? Why would they spend $10 when they can buy the same thing for $5?