I guess good to know this information but why provide in a response to Ted Peele? Seems wrong to extend courtesy of providing any potentially important response/information via some prompting from a poster who is a well documented manipulator.
KCC, what do you specifically mean when you say a T1 name attached when it comes.
Is this the transceiver company that will provide the final packaged Lightwave slot polymer product to hyperscalers/DC's?
Does this include the buyer(s) of the transceivers (AWS, Google, etc)? Or further up the chain, the larger Foundry that will be making the 200 mm wafers w/ PICs for multichannels (4 x 200G for example). Or can it include some or all of these names (companies that are also interested in "first mover" advantage with Lightwave's slot polymer modulators)?
I did find a good post of yours from back in March showing from your time talking with the company and others that Lightwave is working with a very large end user, which makes sense as those end users were even needed to prompt some Foundries to work with Lightwave as they have a key enabler material for modulators and DC's needs.
sold this morning because the reason I bought is no longer valid - I thought there was a leak outside of investors. And so far this week there is no further follow-through - which I definitely would have expected going into PECC.
I do believe there is enough retail here to buy in the large volume that we saw, especially since the prices were so low.
$3.5-$3.60 will be the retest - will wait and see what happens.
It sounds to me like Marcelli indeed was the source once again, and I simply don't see why any shareholder should trust a word he says.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
