Replies to post #133518 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[ORCA]

IMO AND I AM 98% SURE Albright WENT AGAINST VPLM BECAUSE OF THE INSIDERS SELLING ALL ALONG MAKING MILLIONS.HE REALIZED THAT HE WAS USED FOR THEM TO MAKE MONEY.IMO OFCOURSE.AND I SAID THAT SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE.WHEN VPLM GOT SCREWED THEY STOPPED SELLING AS SOON AS THE JUDGE TOLD THEM TO PAY THE LAWYER FEES TO THE DEFENDANTS.YOU SEE NO ONE HAS BEEN FILING FOR SELLING SINCE END OF JULY.I AM TELLING YOU.NOW VPLM IS TRYING TO CORRECT THE SELLING MISTAKE,BUT IT IS TOO LATE.
THE DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE.

[chazzy1]

Thank you rapz for a most authoritative and comprehensive review of Hudnell's arguments. It is blatantly obvious that this judge failed to do his homework and is now getting spanked for it. Hudnell makes a compelling argument for a reversal of this atrociously erroneous ruling which relied on a wrong precedent, an error of law. Granted, the technical material involved is complex and can be quite confusing for anyone who is not an expert in the field, and I think that the defendants took full advantage of this judge's ignorance in this area. But it all goes back to claims construction. I think that Judge Albright must go back and do his homework on this case and correct this egregious error in order to avert a manifest injustice. JMHO.

[3PineNeedles]

Thank you for that explanation.

[straightword]

Hudnell has been a complete and total failure. Did you see his picture on his website? What is he 15 years old? This "rainmaker" has produced not a single dime in financial judgements for VPLM with no sign of anything to come. Remember that settlement with AMZN that was such a sure thing?