Replies to post #724260 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[SkyLimit2022]

mani,

That’s not true or reasonable at all. I cannot respond to every post 😶 .. but I do choose to respond to some who are spreading rumors…

Here’s an example: When someone posts speculation that “no peer review is coming,” while there's a mountain of verifiable evidence to the contrary, that’s just spreading rumors. Posters could have (and many did) legitimately speculate that there would be a protracted delay, but it was reckless nonsense to publish a claim that the whole peer review process was imaginary.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175186188

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175140185

[SkyLimit2022]

mani,

Regarding your comment about “Sky’s clear and obvious extreme bias” …😶



Yes, of course I am biased. I am biased in favor of the company as a shareholder. I have said that several times and I would hope that it is “obvious.” I don’t think that means I’m “pumping” because the meaning of that term connotes short-term deception. I have a couple years and 1,800 posts to demonstrate that I am long and believe in the technology, so I cannot see how anyone could possibly mistake me for someone who is neutral, uncommitted, or undecided on the topic of NWBO.

My bias is increasing over time too. I became more biased in favor of the company when we first learned about some of the emerging combo data, and with the publication of the landmark JAMA paper. Nature and JCI also increased my bias and heightened my interest, and Roswell was also very influential in terms of my increasing bias. The MIA that was awarded and the voluminous MAA submission added to my bias, and I was influenced further in favor of NWBO when the great Linda Liau joined the SAB!

To be perfectly clear in summary, would I consider myself biased?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175149927