News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

10/03/24 1:01 PM

#495455 RE: Zorax #495449

And it's your surmise that the judge, her clerks, didn't review the law covering the unsealing of docs before a ruling?

The defense can say whatever TF they want. But if the law is against them.....

..... it's the fact that the names made public before the judge even started to rule on immunity.
icon url

janice shell

10/04/24 12:05 AM

#495556 RE: Zorax #495449

Do you see where I'm coming from now?

Look. Of course he's making a fuss. But if he tries to use that particular excuse, it won't work. Because no one has done anything wrong.

Sure, he'll object, and he'll appeal wherever he can. But the cat is out of the bag.

Now then: Today, did anyone object to some of the individuals referenced in the superseding complaint being identified? No.