Jeez. I know all that. I'm saying ANYTHING CAN BE USED AS A EXCUSE for the defense. It doesn't matter they have the same unredacted copy, it's the fact that the names made public before the judge even started to rule on immunity. Defense: "Judge Judge some mean people revealed ALL the redacted names before they should have so you MUST throw it all out. It's now tainted everybody, so no fair trail for our cheeto mussolini can be had".
Do you see where I'm coming from now? You're so good analytically, sometimes the simple angles get by you.