I doubt that much of your statement is close to accurate, but even if I believed every word that you said, your implication is still illogical…
Why would somebody holding 130 million shares not be acting in their own best interest to maximize the value potential of those shares? I would.
You expect us to believe that the Harvard lawyer doesn’t know where her greatest wealth opportunity can be found? She is wealthy already, but she is not stupid. Do the math, sir 😶
“Published statements and other publicly available documents affirm that Northwest Biotherapeutics is strongly committed to transparency, regulatory compliance, and the achievement of its long-term business objectives, as evidenced by its ongoing progress with regulatory authorities in both commercial approval and manufacturing. Moreover, it is important to recognize that the leadership of Northwest Biotherapeutics, including senior management, are significant shareholders in the company. As such, they have a direct, vested interest in building assets of real value that will propel the share price upward. It is illogical to suggest that the leadership would act in anything other than good faith, as their personal financial interests are inherently aligned with the success of the company and the realization of an exceptionally high share price. This alignment further reinforces the leadership's commitment to the company's sustained growth and value creation for all shareholders.”
AI SkyLimit says this is inaccurate. Anyone else want to chime in?
>>She paid zero for those shares while receiving $500k to $1M in salary and also receiving likely tens of millions for Cognate deal while having another $100M UK pure play in the works