News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SkyLimit2022

09/08/24 10:45 PM

#718918 RE: theorysuit #718917

suit,

You’re right about one thing: You do need journal articles to explain the results.

The analyses of independent licensed oncologists published in reputable medical journals might be more reliable than message board postings. 😶
Fact ✅️

https://thejns.org/caselessons/downloadpdf/view/journals/j-neurosurg-case-lessons/8/2/article-CASE24112.pdf

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48073-y

https://www.jci.org/articles/view/169314

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847





Bullish
Bullish
icon url

bas2020

09/08/24 11:04 PM

#718920 RE: theorysuit #718917

You're filling the truck up fast with all your garbage...

icon url

dstock07734

09/08/24 11:15 PM

#718922 RE: theorysuit #718917

Which part is a mess? Did Fraudstein brainwash you with his nonsense?

See the following molecular analysis of tumor samples from the GBM patients in the p3 trial. The analysis was done by top-notch researchers along with Dr. Liau and her colleagues. In fact, the bar adopted in the analysis is high since the long-term OS was chosen as greater than five years. The analysis was more rigorous than the normal one since for each sample 100 & 500 nanograms were adopted to make sure the data is accurate.

Find another attacking angle. In the meantime, get your money ready for NWBO longs to collect.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE249282
icon url

XMaster2023

09/09/24 12:35 AM

#718927 RE: theorysuit #718917

The trial is not a mess. You are the mess.