Replies to post #491287 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[DesertDrifter]

Will you vote for the candidate that gave BJ's to Willy Brown?

more evidence-free crap from you. it is known they dated, but as to oral sex, that is just part of your fantasy tool kit, the only link would be to your sexual fantasy life. If you find that a problem even if it were true, why are you are voting for a person found responsible for rape, and a frequent visitor to Epstein pedophilia island? And accused of rape by his first wife, convicted of paying off porn star, yeah, conix, your equivalency is non-existent. You are becoming more of a joke every day.

[zab]

https://www.newsweek.com/video-trump-saying-we-have-keep-our-country-gay-viewed-1m-times-1746076

Trump when he was younger was probably gay.

Then Guiliani his lawyer was always dressing in drag

.https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=8mvDSCiL&id=0B8684D54DB316380BD0F9ED56ECDF7B52A35264&thid=OIP.8mvDSCiLN6zkEJjorjJTKwHaE-&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fabuwjaawap.cloudimg.io%2fv7%2f_lgbtqnation-assets_%2fassets%2f2016%2f10%2fgiuliani-trump-drag.jpg%3f%26auto%3dformat%26auto%3dcompress%26crop%3dfaces%26fit%3dcrop%26w%3d790%26h%3d530&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.f26bc348288b37ace41098e8ae32532b%3frik%3dZFKjUnvf7Fbt%252bQ%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=530&expw=790&q=giuliani+in+drag&simid=608003740312083696&FORM=IRPRST&ck=E8029900798455063DFF1BA455EAFF21&selectedIndex=0&itb=0&idpp=overlayview&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0

[Hanibal]

Kamala Harris never sexually abused nor raped anyone. Trump did though. And you're taking that information and saying yes he has my vote!

Sad. Let me know where you plan to be buried so I can find your grave and piss on it. I'll find Trump's and piss on it too.

[blackhawks]

I won't vote for the candidate whose supporters trade in unfounded allegations while overlooking the convicted felon who covered up his proven payoffs to a porn star and who is an amoral piece of shit who cheated on each present wife with his future wife.

[fuagf]

conix, Consider your comment with more apt, fair and more honestly applicable to substitution made:

Will you vote for the candidate that grabbed women by the pussy without their permission? Will you vote for a less than serious candidate that cannot articulate his position--unless it is to tell the stupid voters who accept that he has the same values--but changed his position? What does that mean? Meaning "I will change my position again after I get voted in, because my values are the same as before when I had another position?"

"Will you vote for the candidate that gave BJ's to Willy Brown? Will you vote for a less than serious candidate that cannot articulate her position--unless it is to tell the stupid voters who accept that she has the same values--but changed her position? What does that mean? Meaning "I will change my position again after I get voted in, because my values are the same as before when I had another position?""

You have no case at all in any comparison between the two on ethical standards
or values, no matter how you spin anything. You get sillier as the years slide by.