Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

conix, Consider your comment with more apt, fair and more honestly applicable to substitution made:

Will you vote for the candidate that grabbed women by the pussy without their permission? Will you vote for a less than serious candidate that cannot articulate his position--unless it is to tell the stupid voters who accept that he has the same values--but changed his position? What does that mean? Meaning "I will change my position again after I get voted in, because my values are the same as before when I had another position?"

"Will you vote for the candidate that gave BJ's to Willy Brown? Will you vote for a less than serious candidate that cannot articulate her position--unless it is to tell the stupid voters who accept that she has the same values--but changed her position? What does that mean? Meaning "I will change my position again after I get voted in, because my values are the same as before when I had another position?""

You have no case at all in any comparison between the two on ethical standards
or values, no matter how you spin anything. You get sillier as the years slide by.