Replies to post #217290 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Gusher405]

I agree.
I also think it is BS that people are banned or limited to 1 post per day with no end date and no justification on what caused the limited posts.

I stopped paying for the product here because it is a bunch of childish bullies as moderators on one of my stocks that continually violate the TOS, name call, etc. and never have their posts removed or limited to number of posts per day. They are the worse abusers of this site!

[janice shell]

Personal attacks on Company management, and non-facts, with no back up proof about company people, should also be off topic, and banned IMO.

It is why so many people left I-Hub.

No, it is not. Yes, some people do believe management should be treated like saints. But the real reason IHub isn't as active as it was once upon a time is that the OTC is dead. People are interested in new things now, like crypto and meme stocks. Those things have had established discussion platforms on other sites for quite awhile, and some IHub posters have migrated to them.

[otterman]

And who decides what information qualifies as truth and/or enough backup.
Ive been on many boards where company directors or IR employees post under an alias and arent transparent about who they are?

Honesty and accuracy are not exactly boundless on the OTC.

[Dspetry]

Ihub won't dissallow these types of posts, its how the "make their money"