News Focus
News Focus
icon url

chazzy1

07/29/24 10:53 AM

#131706 RE: straightword #131703

Straightword, you are parroting the views of the defendants, whereas I am espousing the views of VP's damage assessment experts and legal team. Since the actual value of VP's infringement claims have yet to be ruled on in a court of law, how can you assert with any integrity that those claims are worthless? Once VP has its day in court, Voip-Pal will likely become a household name, at which time I shall be happy to "get back to you."
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

DesktopDR

07/29/24 11:08 AM

#131707 RE: straightword #131703

6-1-24 Reported:
Apple provided a "royalty monetization analysis overview" in which a proposed 1.25% royalty rate, when applied to the accused iPhone, iPad, and Mac products, resulted in purported damages in the amount of $2.8B. A similar analysis attached to a concurrent complaint against both AT&T and Verizon laid out damage amounts just over $1.8B (from AT&T) and roughly $2.4B (from Verizon).
Bullish
Bullish