I find a large percentage of the so called longs here (or as they like to label themselves... "true longs", which by definition is silly, because the definition of being long, is simply to hold any stocks), to have an elitist attitude. In your case, let me demonstrate: you characterize your outward explanation of the value of Vplm as "espousing" , while you characterize straightwards view as "parroting" . I find that elitist and a bit disrespectful because to say someone is parroting something is simply calling them a copycat, while couching your own take in espousing implies the supporting of a cause or a way of life, which sounds a more refined endeavor. You put yourself on a pedestal as such, when both of you were simply giving your opinion on the value of Vplm.
I suppose you would characterize my well supported, factual and documented thoughts on the value of Vplm as dumb, insane, stupid, inconsequential, unsupported, ridiculous, baseless, etc., one of those or some other oft used adjective.
While true that no court has ruled on any infringement value, it's also true that the patented technology was created some 18 years ago and allegedly cost 17 or 18 million dollars and the work of some 20 voip engineers and code writers and was done for digi-phony-ca, another voip services provider, but who did not attempt to fold the tech into their platform and instead just wanted to get rid of it for cost, but sold it to vplm for some $800+k and a few millions shares, who also being a voip service provider, ALSO chose not to incorporate the tech into their 10 year established voip service providing business even after promising to do so and who then, with all the knowledge, expertise, experience that the bio's espoused, in excruciating detail, per the various army of lawyers and BOD, with all those great names like Sawyer and Candy and Chang and Tucker and Thomas and Lee, etc, whom in total, their resumes could author the complete knowledge base of voip itself and patent law...........and who we must assume applied all their knowledge into this Vplm endeavor.....and yet, in the at least 11 years Vplm has ALLEGEDLY been trying to sell, license or otherwise monetize.......THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO RAISE 2 FRIGGIN NICKELS TO RUB TOGETHER, TO DATE. AND THAT NOT ONLY CRUISING THRU 11 YEARS, BUT THRU ALL THOSE LAWYERS AND JUDGES AND HEARINGS ETC ETC ETC. NOT A DIME.
Without me looking up the formal definition of value, I'm gonna step out onto a limb and define it as something that can be put on a market and have enough need and desire to be able to sell at some price in a reasonable amount of time.
With that in mind, I submit and shout from the rooftop that all of this shows and proves that vplm has no value in terms of its product, period, end of story. If you want to try to beat it out of Vplm for yet another 10 years, have fun. Vplm has proven itself in any and sll reasonable ways........to be of NO VALUE except as a share selling scheme
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
