All I can say is that rights travel with the shares. They would have to unwind hundreds of years of law to do that. I’m sorry for your predicament but I believe that they don’t have a leg to stand on here. GLTA!!!!!
The share price drop did not hurt post 3rd shareholders which is how they came up with $612MM (which is a joke) but they do not consider damage to shareholders at any time with the taking of $300 billion from the twins from 2012 through present. The cause of action has been wrong since the opening bell. Plaintiffs legal team is a shambles.
is there a law that cites claims travel with the shares? didn’t hear from anyone so thought i ask again. could this be their game plan that they owe nothing to shareholders on account of net worth sweep as only post-third amendment purchasers are left? at least they admit that the net worth sweep caused injury to pre-third amendment purchasers. what do you think?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
